Skip to main content
  • About
  • Affiliated Faculty
  • Women's Health Issues
  • News
  • Resources
  • Schiffer Fellows
  • Brandt Lecture

Home
  •  
  •  
  •  
Menu

Main navigation

  • About
  • Affiliated Faculty
  • Women's Health Issues
    • In memory of Warren Pearse
    • Call for Papers: Policy Matters articles
    • Special Collections and Supplements
    • Gibbs Leadership Prize
  • News
    • Jacobs Affiliated Faculty in the News
  • Resources
    • Articles and Reports
    • Commentaries, Public Comments, and Amicus Briefs
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Bridging the Divide
  • Schiffer Fellows
    • 2020 Fellows
    • 2019 Fellows
    • 2018 Fellows
    • 2017 Fellows
    • 2016 Fellows
  • Brandt Lecture

Women holding arms in solidarity

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Services to Help Achieve Pregnancy Differ by Clinics’ Title X Status, Study Finds

Services to Help Achieve Pregnancy Differ by Clinics’ Title X Status, Study Finds

Woman holding out positive pregnancy test
  • Mon, 11/25/2019 - 12:19
  • By: lborkowski

WASHINGTON, DC (Nov. 25, 2019) — The types of services that publicly funded family planning clinics offer to help clients achieve pregnancy differ according to whether clinics receive funding through the Title X family planning program, found a study selected as the Editor’s Choice for the November/December issue of Women’s Health Issues. 

Women’s Health Issues is the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, which is based in the Department of Health Policy and Management at Milken Institute School of Public Health (Milken Institute SPH) at the George Washington University.

Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno, formerly of the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) at the US Department of Health and Human Services, and her colleagues analyzed survey responses from 1,615 publicly funded clinics that provide family planning services to see which services they offered to help clients achieve pregnancy. They found that although Title X clinics were less likely than their non-Title-X-funded counterparts to offer infertility treatment, they were more likely to offer reproductive life plan assessment, screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and body mass index (BMI) screening and preconception health care for men. (The authors did not find significant differences in BMI screening and preconception health care for women between clinics that did and did not receive Title X funding.)

The authors note that they collected their data in 2013-2014, before the publication of Providing Quality Family Planning Services: Recommendations of CDC and the US Office of Population Affairs (known as the QFP). Their study can therefore serve as a baseline to help determine whether clinics began offering additional services—such as reproductive life plan assessments and screening for conditions like STDs and obesity that can impede fertility—after the QFP’s release. “Offering these services at all publicly funded family planning clinics can help people to achieve their desired number and spacing of children, and lead to improved health outcomes,” Loyola Briceno and her co-authors conclude.

“The Title X program plays an essential role in assuring that all people can achieve the families they want, regardless of income,” said Amita Vyas, Editor-in-Chief of Women's Health Issues and Associate Professor of prevention and community health at Milken Institute SPH. “This study addresses an important element that policymakers sometimes overlook: the fact that family planning includes not just preventing unwanted pregnancy, but achieving pregnancy when desired.”

“Availability of Services Related to Achieving Pregnancy in U.S. Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics” has been published in the November/December issue of Women’s Health Issues.

  • Related
  • Recent
    Woman with curly hair holding baby and looking over her shoulder
    In Severe Maternal Morbidity Risk, Race, Location, and Insurance Type All Matter, Study Finds
    • 11/30/2022 - 11:34
    IUD on blue background. Photo credit: Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition
    Study Finds Condom Use Lower Among Some, But Not All, Women Who Start Using a LARC Method
    • 10/03/2022 - 09:18
    Woman in surgical mask and doctor's coat standing in front of others in surgical masks
    Evidence Does Not Support Policies That Limit the Types of Physicians Who Perform Abortions
    • 07/12/2022 - 09:36
    Headshot of Cassondra Marshall
    Cassondra Marshall Joins Women’s Health Issues Editorial Board
    • 01/24/2023 - 10:11
    Sara Redd holds Gibbs Prize plaque
    Gibbs Leadership Prize: Best Manuscript of 2022 in Women’s Health Issues
    • 12/21/2022 - 09:29
    Woman with curly hair holding baby and looking over her shoulder
    In Severe Maternal Morbidity Risk, Race, Location, and Insurance Type All Matter, Study Finds
    • 11/30/2022 - 11:34

Categories

  • Women's Health Issues (76)
  • Policy & Health (31)
  • Reproductive Health (29)
  • Editor's Choice (28)
  • Health Disparities (23)
  • Healthcare Services (11)
  • Gibbs Prize (6)
  • Women Veterans' Health (6)
  • Schiffer Fellowship (3)
  • Scientific Integrity (1)
  • 950 New Hampshire Ave, NW,
    6th Floor
    Washington, DC 20052
  • 202-994-0034
  • whieditor@gwu.edu

Useful Links

  • Women's Health Issues ›
  • Bridging the Divide ›
  • Scientific Integrity ›

The Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health works to improve women’s health through research, dialogue, teaching, and information dissemination. We're part of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University.


Read more