Skip to main content
  • About
  • Affiliated Faculty
  • Women's Health Issues
  • News
  • Resources
  • Schiffer Fellows
  • Brandt Lecture

Home
  •  
  •  
  •  
Menu

Main navigation

  • About
  • Affiliated Faculty
  • Women's Health Issues
    • In memory of Warren Pearse
    • Call for Papers: Policy Matters articles
    • Special Collections and Supplements
    • Gibbs Leadership Prize
  • News
    • Jacobs Affiliated Faculty in the News
  • Resources
    • Articles and Reports
    • Commentaries, Public Comments, and Amicus Briefs
    • Scientific Integrity
    • Bridging the Divide
  • Schiffer Fellows
    • 2020 Fellows
    • 2019 Fellows
    • 2018 Fellows
    • 2017 Fellows
    • 2016 Fellows
  • Brandt Lecture

Women holding arms in solidarity

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Node
  3. Study Finds Condom Use Lower Among Some, But Not All, Women Who Start Using a LARC Method

Study Finds Condom Use Lower Among Some, But Not All, Women Who Start Using a LARC Method

IUD on blue background. Photo credit: Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition
  • Mon, 10/03/2022 - 08:18
  • By: lborkowski

WASHINGTON, DC (October 3, 2022)—As use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has increased, public health professionals have worried that LARC users might be less likely to use condoms and miss out on their ability to reduce transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In a study selected as the Editor's Choice for the September/October issue of Women's Health Issues, authors examined condom use by new LARC users and found it to be lower among those aged 20-34. 
 
Women's Health Issues is the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, which is based in the Department of Health Policy and Management at Milken Institute School of Public Health (Milken Institute SPH) at the George Washington University.
 
Using data from the National Survey of Family Growth, Mieke CW Eeckhaut and Katie Fitzpatrick of the University of Delaware identified participants who began using a LARC method (contraceptive implant or intrauterine device) or a moderately effective method (pill, injectable, patch, or ring) between 2008 and 2018 and examined their condom use in the year following contraceptive method initiation. They compared condom use between the two groups overall and within different age ranges (13–19; 20–24; 25–29; 30–34; 35–44), and they controlled for sociodemographic characteristics and the number of male sex partners in the past 12 months. 
 
The authors found lower condom use among those who initiated LARC use compared to those who had started using moderately effective methods, but the differences disappeared for the youngest and oldest participants after controlling for sociodemographic factors and the number of male partners. A difference remained for those aged 20-34. “Efforts to improve male condom use among women initiating other contraceptive methods should be considered, including provider counseling about condom use for STI prevention with all contraceptive users at risk of STIs, especially in light of the current historic highs in STI cases,” Eeckhaut and Fitzpatrick recommend.
 
“This research provides additional evidence that current options for preventing STI transmission while avoiding pregnancy are inadequate,” said Amita Vyas, Editor-in-Chief of Women's Health Issues and associate professor of prevention and community health at Milken Institute SPH. “Women and others at risk of unwanted pregnancy deserve better options for exercising reproductive autonomy while protecting their health.”
 
“Are LARC Users less Likely to Use Condoms? An Analysis of U.S. Women Initiating LARC in 2008–2018” has been published in the September/October 2022 issue of Women's Health Issues.
 

  • Related
  • Recent
    Woman with curly hair holding baby and looking over her shoulder
    In Severe Maternal Morbidity Risk, Race, Location, and Insurance Type All Matter, Study Finds
    • 11/30/2022 - 11:34
    Woman in surgical mask and doctor's coat standing in front of others in surgical masks
    Evidence Does Not Support Policies That Limit the Types of Physicians Who Perform Abortions
    • 07/12/2022 - 09:36
    Silhouette of woman holding a child in front of a sunset at the beach
    Giving Birth After Age 34 Not Associated with Increased Risk for Later Cardiovascular Disease, Study Finds
    • 06/02/2022 - 08:32
    Event announcement for "Promoting Health and Wellbeing Across the Lifespan: A National Policy Agenda" at 12:00pm ET on February 8, 2023
    Feb. 8 Webinar on Agenda for Promoting Health and Wellbeing
    • 02/03/2023 - 15:09
    Headshot of Cassondra Marshall
    Cassondra Marshall Joins Women’s Health Issues Editorial Board
    • 01/24/2023 - 10:11
    Sara Redd holds Gibbs Prize plaque
    Gibbs Leadership Prize: Best Manuscript of 2022 in Women’s Health Issues
    • 12/21/2022 - 09:29

Categories

  • Women's Health Issues (76)
  • Policy & Health (32)
  • Reproductive Health (29)
  • Editor's Choice (28)
  • Health Disparities (23)
  • Healthcare Services (11)
  • Gibbs Prize (6)
  • Women Veterans' Health (6)
  • Schiffer Fellowship (3)
  • Scientific Integrity (1)
  • 950 New Hampshire Ave, NW,
    6th Floor
    Washington, DC 20052
  • 202-994-0034
  • whieditor@gwu.edu

Useful Links

  • Women's Health Issues ›
  • Bridging the Divide ›
  • Scientific Integrity ›

The Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health works to improve women’s health through research, dialogue, teaching, and information dissemination. We're part of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University.


Read more